In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Some individuals in a country have income far beyond the average, due to this, some people have an opinion that the government should regulate level of income that citizens can have. Meanwhile, others argue that opportunity to earn huge salaries is positive for the economy of a country.
Supporters of the idea of limitation of a revenue of workers would probably refer to the fact that economic inequality usually leads to the social differentiation and existence of extremely high paychecks among some means that there are people who live below income poverty line. Thus, in this kind society, middle and rich classes are small groups of people only, the biggest part is poor ones. As a result, the poor get poorer while the rich get richer, that is harmful for the economy of a country in a whole. In addition, level and quality of life of habitants is decreasing rapidly, social tension is growing, crime rates are increasing.
However, some economists claim that economic inequality is beneficial overall for stimulating growth and is merely a necessary part of social progress. First, incentives are greater for innovation and entrepreneurship when inequality is pronounced. Large salaried executive positions, for example, create an incentive for lower paid workers to win coveted labor positions. The less-wealthy members of a society work harder, create new businesses, or invent new products to become a member of the highest income group. On the other hand, when the gap between income levels is small, those in lower income groups have less of an incentive to move up in income.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits, on balance, however I think that economic in equality means that often people are trapped in poverty with little chance to climb up the social ladder.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13804713805 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71958429103 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.081322755 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250802967641 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770059124002 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648754689542 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148067326062 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897817621633 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.