Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Technology is becoming ever-present in a modern classroom and there are those who consider that a great number of finances allocated to education should be spent on computers. Meanwhile their opponents argue that educators are more important and the budget should be spent on them. In this essay I will consider both sides of the argument and then I will give my own opinion.
On one hand, someone can claim that computer programs make the learning process more engaging for students and due to it they are becoming more motivated and included in class work. To illustrate, it is suggested to compare a battered textbook with a colourful and interactive screen of a learning program. It goes without saying that the latter will be more popular among young people. In addition, computers along with the Internet provide an endless supply of learning resources and save a significant amount of time for searching it. That is why authorities should provide modern computer classes in every single school.
On the other hand, technology is not able to provide good knowledge by itself without qualified teachers. First, a good teacher motivates their students and provides moral values as well. There is no software that is capable of doing something similar. It is research-backed that if teachers are satisfied with their job (salary rates included) then educational achievements level is increasing along with knowledge quality received by pupils. Therefore, authorities have to primarily allocate finances on encouraging professionals to become educators and pass their experience and academic knowledge to further generations.
In conclusion, having considered both sides of the argument I assume that both sides have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that teachers are more important than machines because human interactions are essential for a child's development and only them can provide the right direction in learning for the youngsters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...education should be spent on computers. Meanwhile their opponents argue that educators ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37662337662 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8887493245 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4931574019 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191968974972 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575995216365 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486387063824 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114820071165 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070093456545 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.