Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In a capaitalist world economy, it has become more frequent that one faces difficult situations. While some claim that it is better to accept these situations, I hold to the notion that unstoppable trial to progress is the key for success. This will be shown by looking at both views and the reasons behind them.
On the one hand, those who advocate the continuity in unpleasent job may argue that they cannot afford taking risks. If, in their opinion, one quits his job to search for another one, he may end up with no source of money. Moreover, adaption could be the suitable solution for insufficient money. This could be achieved by changing the life style according to the monthly income. For example, working class famillies need to give in their luxury cars and try to minimize their bills. Thus, it is clear that accepting the situation is vital step in the path of peacful life, otherwise one may enter the endless cycle of unacceptance and trying to improve.
On the other hand, I would side with people who reckon that the only thing stands between one and a higher quality of life is his own stamina. To illustrate, there are people who work hard and divide their time between work and study by attending night classes so that they could get an early promotion and consequently a pay rise or even shift their career to more satisfied one. Furthermore, others when they are short in money, they overcome this by thinking out of the box. To clarify, They focus on their abilities and knowledge rather than their qualifications and certificates. For instance, during 2008 crisis, the company which I used to work for announced that there would be a cut in all staff salaries by 20%; therefore, I had to find an alternative source of income. Since I was fond of the internet, I found an online job as a social media evaluator, which was a useful experience because of its flexible hours and working from home.
By way of conclusion, whereas some believe accepting hard situations is better in terms of not risky and easy to adapt, in my perspective, the investing in developing one's qualification and exploitation his knowledge could lead to the welfare of his family. It is thus recommended that people start to alter their beahviour and become more ambitious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to take'.
Suggestion: to take
...t job may argue that they cannot afford taking risks. If, in their opinion, one quits ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...erspective, the investing in developing ones qualification and exploitation his know...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7746835443 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64438347827 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592405063291 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0347831074 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.941176471 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153102594621 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045877658493 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305939737826 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095192935784 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024632773957 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.