In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
Over the past few years, there has been a soaring trend of number of malls on a global scale, which makes people in dilemma over whether it is useful or harmful approach. I hold to the notion that whilst it could has negative effects in terms of closing small shops, there could be some positives for buyers. This will be proven by analyzing the impacts of such a trend with respect to economy and individuals.
To begin with, small shops may be forced to close when they compete with large ones, which could have detrimental influence on economy. This is because expansion of building malls could lead to the rich become richer and the poor become poorer; consequenlty, the middle class, the backbone of any society, would disappear. A prime example of this is hyper markets such as Carefour and Hyper One. The sales of these markets have exceeded 60% of all groceries' sales in Egypt, according to AlAhram newspaper. Hence, this example shows that this kind of markets could result in fewer local shops; therefore, many people tend to lose their jobs, and their ability to buy products as well.
Nevertheless, despite its weeknesses, this phenomenon could bring some benefits to customers. The reason for this is that competition, in general, results in better not only products quality but also prices. For instance, when visiting City Stars mall, more that 250 clothes shops can be explored, where one can compare between several products of different brands, and choose what suits his budget in one visit. Had it not been for large shopping centres, shopping experience would have been more difficult.
By way of conclusion, Even though the preference of shopping from malls could badly affect society, it has some positives for buyers regarding the variety of products. It is thus recommended that economists and authorities ought to work together to study such a phenomenon, and issue new regulations to control the increasing number of malls, if needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...hold to the notion that whilst it could has negative effects in terms of closing sm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in general, kind of, such as, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03353658537 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53132516266 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612804878049 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8129131226 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244223038878 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715746106397 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525429996544 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129195645017 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459330711046 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.