In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on the positive and negative impacts on people going to shopping malls. While some people argue that negative impacts overweight the positive effects, on my point of view I strongly disagree with that argument. In this essay, I shall discuss on the factors strengthening my point of view while analyzing both sides of it to a greater extent.
First and foremost, customers can benefit by shopping in large shopping malls. For instance, they can buy variety of goods under one roof such as groceries, stationary items, baby items, clothes, shoes and other household items. They even can compare goods in different brands and buy the best product according to their need. In addition, they can buy products at a much cheaper price because large shopping malls operates with economies of scale.
On the other hand, when we consider about small shops it helps to earn money for small scale producers, manufacturers; however, it gives less benefits to the general public. If the general public prefers to go to shopping malls there is a risk of closing down the small scale local shops. For instance, in Sri Lanka there are less number of grocery shops operate due to the increasing number of shopping mall operating in the area. Consequently, lot of small scale retailers have lost their jobs due to this reason. As a solution to this issue,smalll scale retailers can supply their goods to these large scale shopping malls instead of operating shops incurring cost on rent,rates and labour.
In conclusion, when we look at the issue from the customer’s point of view it gives positive impacts on them, but when we consider at the point of small scale retailers it denotes high number of negative impacts. It is also believed, that government need to give concessions to small scale retailers to ensure their livelihood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun benefits is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ucers, manufacturers; however, it gives less benefits to the general public. If the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... however, it gives less benefits to the general public. If the general public prefers to go t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es less benefits to the general public. If the general public prefers to go to sho...
^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...benefits to the general public. If the general public prefers to go to shopping malls there i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , smalll
...this reason. As a solution to this issue,smalll scale retailers can supply their goods ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , rates
...f operating shops incurring cost on rent,rates and labour. In conclusion, when we l...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00632911392 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64188769285 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5097135523 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297219203717 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110746302866 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716574093718 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155744674164 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719830967083 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.