Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others
think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.
Discuss both views.
In this modern world, perspectives of how to keep animals are varied
between people. Some people think about caging them in zoos or forests while
others think it is illogical to limit animals’ movements. I am going to discuss
these views according to environmental, personal and economic perspectives.
Keeping some animals in zoos will protect them against predators, bad
weather, and food availability. Nevertheless, keeping animals free is more
logical than isolating them because if we keep animals caged, they would not
be able to have fresh air and chase other animals. Therefore, it is cruel keeping
animals confined in small spaces. It is advisable to put our efforts into keeping
our creatures in their natural habitats, in order to give them the opportunity to
experience normal life.
Keeping animals is essential because some animals are in fact becoming
extinct. Although keeping these animals is costly, the profits made by keeping
these animals are substantial. Take Indian lions for example; a wide range of
people travel to India to see these animals in circuses in India. However, some
people think that governments should invest the money in improving the
infrastructure of their nations instead. Building new electrical power station,
for instance, is more important than spending thousands of pounds to
preserve certain creatures from extinction.
Lastly, keeping animals is important for study and research whereas others
think we have no right to use animals for entertainment and in labs.
To conclude, keeping animals in zoos might have many values but it is irrational
to keep these animals away from their natural habitat. The reasons are that
besides they are not vulnerable creatures, they have the right to survive
independently because of having feelings and emotions as a human.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48611111111 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79104470684 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3344680646 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.38176352705 571% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233310912751 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888347639014 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544481662745 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667534356115 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578160291954 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.