Some people believe that to learn the way other cultures live it is better to watch films or video programs. Others believe that it is better to read books and newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements? Give your own opinion and examples.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">In this globalized world, some society's sectors believe that it is essential to fly directly to the place if they want to know in detail about the local habits, cuisine, music and history of any nation. opposite to them exists a population that reckon there are more accessible records on websites or documentary programmes on tv, </span>to be<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> able to know about specific topics from any particular nation, including the most relevant characteristics from any singular community. I strongly agree that the current digital age aids people to save time and money in unnecessary travels, bringing closer all the knowledge about all the characteristics of any nation and its people. The aim of this essay is to </span>review<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> both different viewpoints and support them with some examples.
Undebatable, visit the country and share time with the local people, is the best </span>manner<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to experience the countries' cultures, because it is the closest way to feel and live like a local, for instance, aboriginal and Indians culture researchers have to go inside of ancient communities and live with them for a certain </span>period of time<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to go deeper in details about their culture. Indeed, it is necessary if people would like to understand feelings and behaviours from locals.
Although, that is not the most effective way to have access to complete information from local cultures, because, all the digital aims like social media and </span>Youtube<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> on the internet, and documentary programmes on tv contain the most complete records from cultures due to the source of that information comes directly from same culture folks. For example, Wikipedia is a website where you can find whatever the person would like to know about the culture from any country and it is </span>accurate<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> because all the content </span>is made<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> by locals.
After all the above, notoriously the best way to </span>obtain<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> information and learn about any specific nation and its people, history, social events, dances, music, cuisine and habits, everyone should search on internet sites or watch some documentaries on tv. However, if people would like to feel local cultures, they should visit the specific country.</span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Opposite
...isine, music and history of any nation. opposite to them exists a population that reckon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and live with them for a certain period of time ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, after all, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02162162162 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.29327025317 2.80592935109 153% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.79074038 49.4020404114 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 222.8 106.682146367 209% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.054242919583 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315341132891 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.014723615236 0.0667982634062 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445036091368 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103667404152 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.4 13.0946893788 194% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.0 50.2224549098 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.23 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.