Methods to reduce waste and recycling should be taught to pupils at school level, as believed by few masses, whereas others opine that these procedures should be taught by the parents at home. I believe that schools ought to make students learn certain skills like waste management and recycling it, home atmosphere is the best arena to inculcate these skills into children by the parents.
Managing the waste and re-treating it in safe and effective manner can be learnt from school along with other academic studies. Teacher could allocate some time slots in time-table for activities pertaining this technique. For instance, an examination could be held for such activities and marks could be given, thereafter. In this way, children would grasp and apply this learning methodology with a lust to score good marks with flying colors.
On the contrary, as much time a child spends with parents, every material he uses daily at home, can be recycled such as paper bags, plastic straws and could be simultaneously taught how. The tissue paper, as an exemplification, he uses for wiping hands and thrown in dust-bin afterwards, can be re-processed and turned back into a new tissue paper and kids could be made to learn the process at home. Moreover, plastic waste from broken toys could be re-melted and can be transformed into ball or cubes for playing purpose.
In conclusion, it can be advocated that though schools are the learning hubs for kids which could teach them to manage their household waste and recycling it properly, that too by fun learning as games, yet homes and parents could teach these aspects in a better manner while utilizing in daily life
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99641577061 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59472463524 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7691533592 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196213447614 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816542852939 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567428376379 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131924817565 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606345052751 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.