Many people hold the belief that success in sports is derived from mental toughness, while others think physical toughness is the key. Personally, I believe that physical fitness is just as important as mental toughness in determining sporting success.
Physical strength has been commonly regarded as an important element in sports. Firstly, muscular strength and key skills such as stamina, flexibility and agility could enhance the ability to perform general sport skills such as jumping or sprinting in the majority of sports. Competitive soccer players, for example, have to brute strength so as not to be burn out during a match or to counter-attack quickly so that the opponents do not retreat on time to defend. Secondly, most elite sportsmen are very cautious and well-prepared in exercising and eating to build muscle. The reason is that physical toughness could help them avoid being injured; or else; the sporting career would be ruined by injuries.
A strong mentality, on the other hand, is also important for any sports professionals to be successful. It is observed that, sport stars often face tremendous stress and setbacks, which in turn results in mental health problems even life-death situations. Therefore, only strong-willed players who are able to overcome those problems would attain great success. Many elite sportsmen like Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo devote themselves to willpower and mental preparation to gain confidence and self-esteem to deal with every challenging situations while others might succumb. Moreover, mental power is responsible for building up resistance to boredom, tiredness and keep players motivated while their body is suffering from fatigue.
From these above mentioned reasons, the conclusion can be drawn that each type of strength has its own perks. Physical strength gives players a constant energy boost, while mental ones help them deal with all obstacles in determining sporting succes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48184818482 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79718108569 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7163942494 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216385239348 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751703702699 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623738978098 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134342465739 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639323484737 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.