Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial. However, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some actions that could help the environment?
The essential need to sustain and retain our natural space, in which we live in, is paramount. While some people appreciate this fact, the practicability of it, in our society today, is quite questionable. Overtime, there have been various dangers that threaten the preservation of our environment, some of which are caused by increase in population; and to an extent, ignorance.
There is no doubt that, each year the population of the world increases, arithmetically, from previous year. The number of people in planet earth is on the rise; there is unprecedented inclination in the number of populated cities, and rustic areas are not spared as well. Consequently, there have been need for expansion - housing facilities, welfare centres, industries and educational institutions need to be built. To keep up with this demand, natural reserves and forests are encroached into to provide space for intending structures and facilities. The trees are required of their firm stems and branches for timber and plywood to construct. To this end, the forest reserves deplete on the altar of human growth. Another reason the natural reserves are effortlessly stripped - off and endangered is down to the dearth in awareness. For instance, in developing countries, no commitment is made to informing the people on the need to plant trees. Therefore, there exist the indiscriminate treatment to plant life, also, the killing and unauthorised capture of birds and insects that would have served to prolong the reproduction of plants.
To put an end to these practises of disregarding our ecosystem; there is an exigent move to implement and utilise another resource to build our homes and schools; and also to change formation of building. To illustrate further, high rise buildings can serve as an effective alternative, both in the utilisation of the limited space to build and in meeting the needs of the population it serves. Again, engineers and architects can inform, design and structure out another durable material to replace the use and dependence of wood in construction. Another step to take is the intentional and targeted awareness directed to planting of trees. To encourage afforestation is to replenish, multiply and secure the future our environment and tropics.
Summarily, there is no exhaustible level of protection and care we can give in regards to the conservation of our inartificial habitat. Therefore, the need to be cautious of how it is used; the demands placed on it, at the spite of overcrowding and structural scarcity begs restraint as alternatives abound and should be duly applied to ensure sustainability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate this fact, the practicability of it, in our society today, is quite questiona...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...evel of protection and care we can give in regards to the conservation of our inartificial ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 41.998997996 171% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27078384798 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12240077956 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572446555819 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2004844336 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.789473684 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873260812163 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265762754593 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030112968967 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505436349622 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387582538721 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.