Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas, whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that it is necessary to stop tourism for protecting the native culture of various areas, whilst their counterparts opined that it is not beneficial as changes are certain to happen. In my opinion, I believe that although tourism has some negatives, overall it is a boon to the country’s economy, therefore should not be banned.
A growing way of research suggests that tourism is a threat to local culture. One of the key reasons is that international tourism increases the intercultural interactions among people. This can lead to the adoption of foreign culture easily, which thereby impacts on native culture and traditions. Taking India as an example, the regular influx of tourists has increased communication between locals and visitors. Nevertheless, people are likely to migrate from their native countries to adopt the lifestyles of others.
However, a complete ban on tourism has some cons. One of the major impacts would be on the local businesses. This means that the owners of native companies might face a loss without consumerism as they considered tourists as their sole customers, which ultimately compel them to shut down their shops. For instance, a minimum of a six-month ban on visitors in Bali, for cleaning the polluted beach leads to shutting down the careers of many local shopkeepers, who used to sell souvenirs over there.
In conclusion, while tourism can benefit the countries developing economy, it can also threaten the traditional values of local culture. It is my considered opinion that despite some negative effects, I believe the pros of tourism to developing nations are undeniable, so it must not be prohibited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conomy, therefore should not be banned. A growing way of research suggests that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20664206642 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90913485251 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4758220708 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.538461538 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270113201237 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948417132502 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756040683503 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160398659807 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480703488441 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.