Many people aim to achieve a balance between work and life but only a few people achieve it. Why is this problem happening? What are the solutions to this problem?
Nowadays, many individuals wanted to achieve work-life balance, which is merely possible for most of them to attain. Although this problem is caused by the workaholic nature of people for earning more money, they could stabilize it with flexibility in their working routines.
The two leading causes of unbalanced work-life are higher working demands and lesser family interactions. Firstly, people are work-oriented and spend most of their time at the workplace to accomplish the given tasks. They sometimes have to work overtime regardless of their usual working hours, which thereby impacts on their personal life. Take employees of Multinational Companies, for instance, they are required to work at least nine hours a day as most of them are appointed on a contract basis. Therefore, they get easily tired in the evening and could not spend quality time with their partners. Secondly, a stressful working life cannot let the people enjoy their relationships. After the job, they have less time to interact with parents, partners as well as children, which ultimately spoil their bondings.
However, a work-life balance can be achieved with a few simple solutions. First and foremost, flexible working hours can let the employees concentrate on family and office properly. To be more specific, working from home is a better option for those who need to do household chores along with their job. For instance, according to an article published in The Guardian, female employees in Finland can continue their job after maternity leave with a simple flexibility of working from home. This enables them to care for their babies alongside official tasks. Furthermore, the working individuals can spend their weekends by organizing a family day-out or dinner. This will not only help them to get fresh from the monotony but also maintain a healthy relationship with the loved ones.
In conclusion, the reasons and feasible solutions to attaining a balance between work and life have been discussed. It is categorically mentioned that the imbalance in working-life is caused by high work-pressure and minimal family interactions, however, these problems can be solved by flexible work routines or by planning a family trip during holidays.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3323943662 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83615112848 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560563380282 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9553763437 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231953323505 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810908157219 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633668361994 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162972826497 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539501391479 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3323943662 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83615112848 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560563380282 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9553763437 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231953323505 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810908157219 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633668361994 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162972826497 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539501391479 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.