Some people believe that to reduce the amount of time people spend commuting (travelling to work), parks and gardens close to city center should be replaced by apartment building for commuters to live in. However, others disagree with this.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Concentration of corporate hubs in major cities has aggravated the issue of road traffic management. Construction of residential properties in the open public spaces near the center of city could provide resolution as mooted by some, on the other hand some sections of society oppose this idea. This essay will discuss both the views and will opine why this will not be a great idea.
Firstly, developing a housing community near the workplace for a majority of professionals will soothe the stress levels, as they have to travel a meager distance. This will in turn lead to softening of traffic congestion and lower consumption of fuel. Thus, control on pollution and green house gas emissions. In addition to these benefits, masses will have more personal time. For instance, a recent survey by Care foundation in four metro cities found that humans residing in proximity to their workplace have less lifestyle disorders as compared to others.
On the other hand, open spaces like gardens and parks are the lifeline of cities. They act like refreshment centers. The flora and fauna enables natural environment that provides fresh and recyclable air. Furthermore, it enhances healthy lifestyle specially among the kids and elders who loves to flourish in outdoor environment. It leads to overall development when public in general come out of their houses and socialize. This is the real essence of healthy living.
To summarize, in my opinion it is not a feasible idea to convert parks into concrete jungle. Other alternatives like cycling paths and public transport initiatives should be incentivized for smooth movement of passengers. In this way we can secure a better future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in general, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79510462355 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5547884895 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1764705882 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150073603634 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390408203054 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373207152791 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865670368543 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384724831324 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.