Some people believe that the restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Presently, the issue of preserving ancient buildings has risen into prominence in many places in the country. However, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debate concerns the economic aspect. That is why there has been a growing body of opinion in favor of demolishing these buildings and construct new ones. Up to a large extent, I concur with this school of thought because restoring older buildings does not only require a huge financial budget, but it would not serve different contemporary needs of that particular place.
Firstly, there is not an iota of vacillation that preservation of old buildings would not comply with the economic aspect. Given that most of these buildings currently are in worse condition and can collapse at any time. It would be foolish to waste taxes collected from the hard-earned money of the public without considering the resiliency of old buildings to survive further. Statics have shown the spike in the construction of the new building on the place of older ones in all parts of India. Therefore, taking the financial aspects into account, demolishing old buildings is recommended.
Let us not forget either that old building also unable to fulfill the current requirements of residents of that area. For instance, one place having older building lacks a hospital, which is the basic need of the hour. Provided that architecture of old one does not match with a modern hospital, even tough if governmental authorities spend limited budget on ancient buildings instead of preparing new medical institution, that would be wrong on humanitarian grounds. Thus, new buildings ought to be constructed on the place of these old ones to better serve human needs.
On the other hand, there is a strong argument for the restoration of old buildings considering them as a cultural carrier and symbol of historical importance. However, I contradict this statement by suggesting that every place has many other options to connect with history and their cultures such as art galleries and museums.
As illustrated above, in my perception, antique buildings need to be demolished for constructing new ones to avoid waste budget and meet the public's current requirements. If we try to restore historical monuments now, they will need maintenance and restoration at frequent times. So better to build brand new and modern buildings with modern material to enhance the aesthetic pleasure of the place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king the financial aspects into account, demolishing old buildings is recommended...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24365482234 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91632207111 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.681601842 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287487596173 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983426066087 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451038206156 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169273956008 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455831312806 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.