Some people believe that the restoration of old buildings costs too much; we should demolish them and build new ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the renovation of ancient buildings is extremely expensive. Hence destructing them to build novel ones is believed to be more efficient. While this idea may seem more practical from a modern perspective, I think that keeping these buildings would be more beneficial.
Admittedly, destroying these obsolete structures and building new ones seems immensely helpful. Since they are considered to be uninhabitable any more, pulling them down and reconstructing other facilities would vastly help governments. These places not only can be used as governmental facilities but can also be used to increase occupational capacity especially in major cities. Secondly and more importantly, in order to preserve these buildings, repairments are required invariably. This process requires substantial amounts of funds that would not have an immediate obvious influence on the welfare of citizens.
However, I contend that preserving these buildings would contribute to the development of both culture and national income. Regarding culture, these historic structures maintain the old style of architecture which is considered to be a part of the identity of citizens' ancestors. They can encourage people to save their habits and traditions throughout various centuries. As for the national income, many tourists around the world are immensely interested in visiting these old buildings, especially if they were prominent in the world's history. The Colosseum, for example, despite that it is partially destroyed and looks like basic construction, Italy gains tens of millions every year due to the numerous visitors who come from all over the world to watch it.
To recapitulate, replacing these buildings may seem valuable for many. However, I consider their both cultural and national significance is far more paramount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...cient buildings is extremely expensive. Hence destructing them to build novel ones is...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...specially if they were prominent in the worlds history. The Colosseum, for example, de...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63898916968 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07375229742 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4489825245 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11542777515 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473228641098 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549547943845 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775231246647 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427026438147 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.