Nowadays the development of industrial sectors rises significantly as the same as the emission that is produced according to with the activities from these sectors. Some people argue whether applying high taxes on Industrial companies is the most available solution for a better environment or other solutions can be used. This essay will explain both views and explain the recent options regarding this problem.
First of all, It is true that taxes can be one solution to reduce the number of emissions in the environment. Industrial companies have to pay more in taxation because these sectors have the biggest production of emissions in the environment. the taxes that collected could be used to ease the process of reducing pollution by funding some activities that neutralize the emission such as planting three, environmental campaign, support Greenpeace communities.
On the other hand, there are also various strategies to protect the environment from pollution. First of all, industrial companies can switch the sources of energy into renewable energy so that the number of waste that throw into the environment is near to zero-emission without Carbon Monoxide or other dangerous chemical contamination. For Example, in 2035, Some countries in Europe will develop a system to produce electricity from hybrid renewable resources such as solar panels, wind turbines, and will try to stop the utilization of oil and coal as sources. In addition, the companies which are aware to minimize the pollution by good waste management should give rewards. These rewards will give an advantage for the company itself. For instance, companies that have green labels from their management systems can get extra loans from the bank to support their business. Consequently, Many companies will embrace their waste management system to be more eco-friendly.
In conclusion, applying high taxation is not the most way that is available to reduce pollution, instead of doing this thing, people should use as many ways to reduce pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uction of emissions in the environment. the taxes that collected could be used to e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39498432602 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88693800105 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3953296131 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225793578845 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735509826442 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491251186648 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142255645719 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334525554948 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.