In the development of technology, the human has an easy access to follow about an up-to-date information. Moreover, this case will make a person have some options to make their own decision. But, both parties have their reason to the argument that whether, currently, we have many alternatives or not. And I definitely agree that more choices are caused by the improvement of technology at the present.
To begin with, better access to the world will make sure that people know about the factual data and, furthermore, it would increase the chance of information by using modern media, such as internet and handphone, that will provide exchange information in each people rapidly. For example, I want to continue my study about the aerospace engineer in the TU Delft University, but, in the same time, my friend who has studied in the UK told me that the UK is more appropriate because It can help to conduct research there. So, by technology such as social media, the information that people take would be easy and this is why today we have many options.
Sometimes, money and location can be the most reason to expand the number of choices. In the other part of the world, there is any community who hasn’t chances to choose their options because they live in a remote area where this place is not connected with the media communication. For instance, if we live in a remote area, we wouldn't get in touch with each other like modern people. Therefore, the population who lived in a remote area have slowly updated information that makes minimize their choices
In conclusion, the information that comes from modern technology will give people to generate some options. Moreover, not all people have many choices because they cannot access the information directly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...evelopment of technology, the human has an easy access to follow about an up-to-date informati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...stance, if we live in a remote area, we wouldnt get in touch with each other like moder...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67444490606 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8759215928 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164144077488 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664018785177 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505990589266 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106737717267 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302579503539 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.