Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that circumstances of an individual crime, a motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment
Discuss both the view and give your own opinion.
Imprisonment of criminals is essential to maintain law and order in society. It is contended by some that punishment for every criminal activity should be standardized while others advocate that situations under which crime is committed should be taken into account. This essay supports the latter argument and will discuss both the views.
Firstly, it is assured that fixed punishment will expedite judgment and reduce crime rate. Since magnitude and type of sentence would have been defined in the law books, this would make easier for the judges to pass judgment against criminal proceedings. As a result, number of cases pending in courts would be reduced and timely delivered justice would create a fear among bad elements of the society. For instance, as per survey conducted by Times Now, in Saudi Arabia due to system of defined punishment, crime rate is 69% low as compared to its neighboring countries.
The above argument is not that logical as it sounds. Human activities are greatly influence by surrounding situations. Crime is no different. There can be different reasons for committing murders. One can be done intentionally because of personal revenge and other can result from an accident as an act of self defense. Same punishment for both persons is totally unfair. Similarly, a mother stealing food from a shop to feed his child is entirely different from a corrupt government employee misusing public funds for his personal adventure.
So, as explained above, in my view justice can be delayed for sometime but the circumstance should always be kept in mind while deciding sentence for a criminal or a person, as it is matter of life of that person.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, while, for instance, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09782608696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.744155635 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2437025685 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333915886874 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950846067684 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103469392192 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19956250283 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594755468471 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.