Some people believe that for those who commit serious crimes, the death penalty should be the right punishment. Others, however, think that it is not ethical to punish the criminals by killing them. Discuss the positive aspects of both views and give your own opinion.
The crime rate has exponentially proliferated in the last few years and is demanding a serious action to curb its growth. In this regard, many have suggested that criminals committing heinous crimes should only be eligible for a death sentence, whereas some consider it as inhuman. This essay agrees that people involved in such crimes should not be spare and should be hanged till death. A complete agreement to this understanding will be established in the subsequent sections of this essay.
One of the conspicuous reasons to favor the death penalty is to set an example for others to refrain them from such evil acts. If a harsh punishment mechanism is in place, especially the ones costing their lives, people would not even think to attempt such disastrous and wicked offences. Therefore, this essay supports this opinion that a strict punishment is essential to message the world about a no mercy rule for such crimes. For example, Terrorists, rapists, contract killers and many more if left alive would pose a life of many innocents to risk due to their malign habits or illegal professions.
On the other hand, it is argued that by doing this government would take away the chance to permit such criminals to improve in the future. It is believed that right training, guidance, and teachings such as spiritual and ethical lessons can aid them to improve and get on to the right track. However, despite this, there is no guarantee that all culprits would improve, and is plausible that they might repeat their actions after returning to their normal routines. Thus, this outlook is disregarded in this essay. To support, as per the latest article published in the time's magazine, repeat offenders account for a 30% of the overall crimes because criminals routed back to their fundamental nature and environment after completing their imprisonments and rehabilitation.
In conclusion, although death punishment would deprive them of an opportunity to be a better citizen in the future, but the security of individuals cannot be compromised to respect this factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...per the latest article published in the times magazine, repeat offenders account for ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09970674487 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77852080162 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592375366569 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.828606293 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195761740076 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067314256773 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527884265873 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117958340234 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304216516261 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.