Some people believe today that everyone has a right to access to the Internet and that governments should provide this access for free. Other people believe that access to the internet is not a right and should be paid for like other services.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, it is true that the advent of the internet has changed people's lives worldwide drastically. While some think that the internet should be free for everyone and the government should subsidize the cost, critics argue that it is not practical. The reasons behind each side would be discussed, and I will express my point of view in the conclusion.
Proponents of free-internet for everyone, offer various reasons to support their argument. Firstly, these days, there are vital tasks, ranging from financial transactions with banks to research and education, which could only be accessed via the internet. It is not fair that people be deprived of these services due to financial issues. Secondly, free-internet increase the overall quality of life for everyone for poor people, who do not easily access to the internet. Not only people could communicate more convenient via the internet, but also do they could entertain without spending too much money on outside activities.
However, the opponents, who do not reject the vital role of the internet, have concerns regarding this plan. They point to the fact that the government's budget should be allocated to plans with higher priority, such as improvement in infrastructure, state education system, or healthcare facilities. Furthermore, interference of the government would influence the economic balance in the internet market. While, now, internet providers compete to attract costumers by both increasing the quality and decreasing the cost, the new plan would lead the private sector to bankruptcy. Finally, if people oblige to pay for their usage of the internet, they would surf the web or download files responsibly, but when the internet is free of charge, people would not care about their usage anymore.
In conclusion, whereas there are some merits for free-internet for everyone, I believe that it is not a practical plan, and the government should spend money on urgent plans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld not care about their usage anymore. In conclusion, whereas there are some me...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34838709677 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85260711029 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583870967742 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3817656967 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376341097285 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124658704635 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825470420294 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237648565268 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294660756218 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.