Whether providing the internet by the government should be free or payment-oriented has evolved as a controversial topic. Despite the arguments refuting the logic of providing the internet for free, I am more convinced that the government should allocate free internet to all citizens owing to some reasons.
To commence with, those who place a great emphasis on the internet of payment-oriented point to the need for paying back the government subsidies, thereby reducing the economic burden on the shoulders of the state. To put it differently, through maintaining and paying back of the government allowance, it is highly likely, the government officials will be able to lay the foundation to other national developments including road infrastructure betterment and healthcare system improvement, creating hopefully a social improvement. In this case, the argument goes that the more well-equipped the services are, the more money people expend. This, in turn, might play a useful part in motivating the government to access the fast-pace internet.
However, the internet based on payment should be categorized in a less important level when it comes to information availability. Simply put, inextricably intertwined with information accessibility, it is believed that access to the source of the information should also be free. This may mean that, if are more aware of current situations surrounding them, they will capable to take decisive action or down-to-earth decision when facing an unpredictable dilemma. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by unprecedented catastrophe forecasting by the weather reports. Free access to the internet allows people to be aware of while reducing their exposure to the dangerous position in any locations they are. Therefore, access to the free internet is set to lay the groundwork for saving people's lives, especially for those who fail to purchase for the internet due to lack of budget.
To conclude, from the above reasons, while acknowledging the substantial role of preservation of government subsidies in order to improve the national status, the internet can be judged as an effective way to raise people awareness of the vital information, enhancing people's safety.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47976878613 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2485909117 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575144508671 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.2406717378 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.846153846 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6153846154 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407479223365 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134081460771 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786456828111 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22463002922 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793027249402 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.