Some people believe that universities should only accept students with high marks. Others think that students of all ages and ability levels should be able to attend universities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people argue that only high scoring students should be admitted to universities. While others believe that regardless of a score benchmark, all should be entertained. In my view, only meritorious students should be given a chance to be admitted, regardless of age.
In my opinion, brilliant minds, without age factors, must be allowed to study in tertiary educational institutions. Being of the highest order, these institutions have a capacity to accept a sizable number of batches. In addition to this, only few such as these exist in a country, owing to monetary constraints or other reasons. Further, with a booming population, if everyone is entertained, there might be a chance that even disinterested students get an admission. This would create a chaotic atmosphere as talented minds might not get a seat. thus, by setting up a benchmark, manifold situations can be resolved.
On the other hand, by handing out seats to everyone, would not only give people a fair chance to prove their mettle but also gain respect among the general public. With different levels of students, everyone gets a chance to up their game against their rivals. Thus, a sense of healthy competition develops. Meanwhile, the parents would be contented to have their child studying in prestigious institutes and earning a degree. As it is meant for the service of general public, it would gain much laurels from its fair service to give everyone an opportunity to grow.
In conclusion, considering both views, I reinstate that offering admissions to only meritorious students is a well-suited approach for a limited number of institutes like these.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...ertiary educational institutions. Being of highest order, these institutions have a capaci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...as talented minds might not get a seat. thus, by setting up a benchmark, manifold si...
^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... mettle but also gain respect among the general public. With different levels of students, eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
... to up their game against their rivals. thus, a sense of healthy competition develop...
^^^^
Line 9, column 462, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...gree. As it is meant for the service of general public, it would gain much laurels from its fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 492, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ervice of general public, it would gain much laurels from its fair service to give e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21509433962 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9761697414 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615094339623 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1678211187 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288645902023 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933363974348 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101066662954 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17334506315 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136376295054 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.