Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are mixed belifes about using animals as medical reasearch for human benefits. For some people it is totaly acceptable for others it is wrong. I am sure that we need to treat other spices as humans treat eachother.
Nevetrtheless, history shows how we have abused/torqued animals for our own interests. For example, man's best friend is dog. Despite that, we did send Laika to space, in order to undertand if it is possible to survive in those harsh conditions. Accordingly under survailance he did survive. Altough cause of teath was starvation. humans countered that as a sucess and next step was needet to make. In second lunche passanger was a monkey. cause on death was same. examples like those, will illustrate colourfully how brutal we can be to achieve our desires.
On the other hand, chemical impact on animals have beneffited ourselves greatly. I would like to point out reasearch about chemical use. The use of the pestosides will continiusly rise. In order to protect us, it is essential to indentifying risks and dangers wich come with use. In that case,mouse is the best candidate to understand the impact to live material. As mouse is easy and conviniant to control. Taking everyting into consideration, in my opinion it is not neccesary to torque and kill animals for our penefit.
To summarise, how humans use animals for personal intrest it is always essencial to understand how that animal suffers. we should stop consuming products wich we do not need. As a result those products won't need reasearch on animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...e to survive in those harsh conditions. Accordingly under survailance he did survive. Altou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
... Altough cause of teath was starvation. humans countered that as a sucess and next ste...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cause
...n second lunche passanger was a monkey. cause on death was same. examples like those,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Examples
... was a monkey. cause on death was same. examples like those, will illustrate colourfully...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rutal we can be to achieve our desires. On the other hand, chemical impact on an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , mouse
...dangers wich come with use. In that case,mouse is the best candidate to understand the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... to understand how that animal suffers. we should stop consuming products wich we ...
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...consuming products wich we do not need. As a result those products wont need rease...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, second, so, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97683397683 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80976581194 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0834339901 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 58.5909090909 106.682146367 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7727272727 20.7667163134 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.95454545455 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208669157502 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554548385959 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08259452361 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143919538312 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106707787298 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.