Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are mixed beliefs about using animals as medical research for human benefits. For some people it is totally acceptable for others it is wrong. I am sure that we need to treat other spices as humans treat each other.
Nevertheless, history shows how we have abused/torque animals for our own interests. For example, man's best friend is a dog. Despite that, we did send Laika to space, to understand if it is possible to survive in those harsh conditions. Accordingly, under surveillance, he did survive. Although the cause of death was starvation. humans countered that as a success and the next step was needed to make. In the second lunch passenger was a monkey. cause of death was the same. examples like those will illustrate colourfully how brutal we can be to meet our desires.
On the other hand, the chemical impact on animals has benefitted ourselves greatly. I would like to point out research about chemical use. The use of pesticides will continuously rise. In order to protect us, it is essential to identify risks and dangers which come with use. In that case, the mouse is the best candidate to understand the impact to live material. As the mouse is easy and convenient to control. Taking everything into consideration, in my opinion, it is not necessary to torque and kill animals for our benefit.
To summarise, how humans use animals for the personal interest it is always essential to understand how that animal suffers. we should stop consuming products which we do not need. As a result, those products won't need research on animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ly, under surveillance, he did survive. Although the cause of death was starvation. huma...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...ough the cause of death was starvation. humans countered that as a success and the nex...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cause
...he second lunch passenger was a monkey. cause of death was the same. examples like th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Examples
... a monkey. cause of death was the same. examples like those will illustrate colourfully ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w brutal we can be to meet our desires. On the other hand, the chemical impact o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... to understand how that animal suffers. we should stop consuming products which we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, nevertheless, second, so, for example, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88014981273 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7524242387 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9556201019 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 59.2272727273 106.682146367 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1363636364 20.7667163134 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254189057797 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671773630766 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892550441843 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171023132964 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118238786877 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.0946893788 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.