Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Industrial waste disposal was one of the biggest and toughest task ahead of establishment for various nations but now the situation is getting worsen as daily household waste is not getting recycled and as a result dumps can be seen on streets and roads. In order to increase the amount of recycling of household waste, many people advocate that authorities should take some strict actions and new amendments are required so that situation can be brought under control. I believe that it is the moral responsibility of humans to keep their vicinity clean, however, if they are failing in it, new laws should be legalised.
Admittedly, nature has created every living being in the same ways and there is a fundamental similarity between all the living beings is that they keep their proximity clean. But now-a-days, humans are failing in doing so and in order to memorise their duties, it is necessary to penalise them. This can only be done by the virtue of laws. Many nations has adopted this strategy and results are commendable. Recycling of waste was approximately doubled in Ireland after they make it compulsory for every citizen to drop their waste at recycle points.
Apart from the fear of getting penalise, education is another appropriate way to teach the deteriorating effects of waste to dispose off without treatment. In the rural areas, people are not educated enough and they do not know the results of their lifestyle on nature and our planet. This can only be achieved by providing them proper training of recycling their household waste. Being Human Foundation has done a commendable job in this regard as they provided all the facilities to some villages in Goa and their waste disposal was reduced by 90%.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, it is clear that education and new amendments are required and the situation can only be controlled by collaboration of education and laws. Government should promote both so that planet can be saved for upcoming generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...one by the virtue of laws. Many nations has adopted this strategy and results are c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, apart from, as a result, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00903614458 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73902851044 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9006988543 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240110801678 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824953734626 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638429801753 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145798928932 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619462891461 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.