Some people think the modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
With cutting-edge invention in technology, especially in social media, according to some people, as a human being, we are more connected than ever while others argue that it is making people anti-social. In my opinion, although technology has detrimental impact on real world social skills to a certain extent but the effectiveness of any tool lies in its users and the way they exploit it.
To begin with, technology has completely changed the face of communication and the way we connect to over loved ones. It definitely has turned the world in to a global village where establishing a connection is just a fingertip away. For example, popularity of family groups on WhatsApp is clear evidence that how much it has assisted in connecting to our relatives. In addition, platform, such as Facebook, enables user to create community groups of like-minder people who can share the ideas and take some concrete actions on real social issues. Thus, the role of science and technologies in connecting people from all over the world is crystal clear.
However, it has some downsides as well due to its excessive utilization. Many youths spend most of their time on social networking websites, which not only disconnect them from the real world but also make them more lethargic. For example, 70% of college graduates lacks social and communication skills when they apply for their first job. Moreover, due to obsession with virtual friends, rather than forming meaningful and healthy bonds with surrounding people, people believe in temporary and meaningless relationships. Consequently, we are dealing with increasing number of insensitive and intolerance individuals.
In Conclusion, technology is a double-edged sword. So it is up to people how much they should rely on it for socialization. If it is effectively utilised, it is a blessing else it just a curse for mankind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06096971208 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601973684211 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8850738258 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150830272302 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044849908236 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04638509686 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913620012169 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339922033562 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.