Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need. Others, however, prefer to give money to national and international charitable organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays people are excited to get associated with some kind of charitable work. While some provide direct financial help to the needy, others prefer to make their contribution through any international or national non-profitable organizations. In my opinion, helping directly could benefit to some extent, however, charitable organizations can help make a huge difference in society.
As the population below the poverty line is mostly illiterate, they do not have the knowledge of the proper government schemes and channels to draw benefits from them. Provided that, if by any means, they register for help in the government offices, despite laws and regulations, usually they are deprived of their rights. For example, under the sanitation scheme, the government of India promised to construct community toilets in all the villages. While the work had started on time, authorities stopped the work halfway by making false excuses. When ordinary people saw such injustice happening with the lower class they strive to make a difference in their lives by assisting them with direct financial help without any intermediate in order to create a direct influence in the lives of the needy.
However, some people still prefer to donate to charitable trusts because there are some non-profitable organizations which have set principle to support society. People can observe their work and fructifying results closely before making any contributions to their good cause. For instance, I started donating every year to ISKCON, a world-known trust when I came to know about their mid-day meal program which they run in cooperation with the government. Due to this program, the student’s populations in the local community have increased by more than 36%. Therefore, for becoming a part of a large scale solution people place their trust in international or national charitable organizations.
In conclusion, while donating money directly to someone in need can make an impact on an individual’s life. However, I believe, multinational NGOs which are working towards the goodwill of society can impeccably change many people's lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e work halfway by making false excuses. When ordinary people saw such injustice happ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct influence in the lives of the needy. However, some people still prefer to don...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50453172205 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0630835758 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586102719033 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3317355055 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.466666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210973185506 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733084104672 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768597155482 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141703746244 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931995986972 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.