Some people believe that the government should not spend too much money on outer space exploration.
Do you agree or disagree?
Governments around the world are spending an enormous amount of money on space programs. It is opined by some people that the administration is squandering taxpayers’ money by investing it in space exploration, whereas there are several sectors on the earth which need immediate financial support from the administration. In my opinion, the government should first handle problems on the earth and cease funding for space programs.
The first and foremost challenge in front of developing nation’s governments is starvation. Because local administration fails to provide varied employment opportunities for the people, as there is an absence of industrialization. Also, the common man is not being furnished with proper means of agriculture in order to grow and feed their family. Thus, it is better for the government to invest in their economy first to generate revenue and jobs for its own people.
In addition, receding life expectancy is another major setback for many nations where people are being deprived of medication, even for treatable diseases. For example, many children in Ethiopia have suffered from malaria, cholera, and flu, and then died, from diseases for which vaccines are discovered decades ago, but, eventually not provided to the people because the government has less budget for medical care than space research.
However, there are still some people who would argue that space exploration is needed, as the earth is being depleted from its resources and there is no other way to replenish it, other than looking for it on a similar planet like the earth. I believe, while it could be true, no one can actually guarantee such outcomes. Therefore, educating the people residing on the earth about proper utilization and maintenance of the earth’s natural resources seems obvious, such as, proper sanitation channels would not pollute existing freshwater resources and using renewable energy sources could degrade carbon footprint.
To conclude, draining money in outer space programs is a complete waste as it is not solving current issues. Governments should rather make the investment in projects which will work for the well-being of people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4298245614 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94806017363 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7394357292 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174946165434 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660096603538 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589106532126 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108967017573 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819746140836 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.