Some people think that public libraries are no longer important, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Public libraries are becoming less popular over the past few decades. It has been suggested by some people that society no longer requires libraries whereas others still reckon it is needed. In my opinion, the public library is a significant part of any society and its existence is essential.
There are many supporters of technology who believe when all the information is available on their technical gadgets, the use of libraries is redundant. Undoubtedly, the availability of the internet anytime anywhere has changed our lifestyle. Now, news updates flash on our mobile screen within hours of the incident. Free pdf versions of books are easily available on the web with a click of a button. However, it is very unlikely that the reader will stay focused and persistent during his/her study time, especially, youngsters because of the constant distraction that the internet can create. For instance, pop-up updates on facebook from friends or continuous ringing of receiving text messages usually tempts people to check their mobile immediately. Thus, they lose concentration in studies.
Nonetheless, libraries furnish dedicated space and environment for people of all ages who are interested in learning. The secluded and silent atmosphere of the library helps individuals to concentrate which is nearly impossible to get anywhere else. Moreover, abundance books and reading material available there makes the task at hand, whether it is research work or assignment, easier to accomplish. In addition, libraries usually document incidents related to local history which is probably impossible to find on the internet.
In conclusion, it is evident that public libraries are losing their popularity because of advancements in technology. However, I believe, for uninterrupted study time and to gather more information about local history libraries are imperative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us, they lose concentration in studies. Nonetheless, libraries furnish dedicated...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bly impossible to find on the internet. In conclusion, it is evident that public...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...local history libraries are imperative.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5574912892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97593613825 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3438415271 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160053201412 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488099467492 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627323438834 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107585257516 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913012979193 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.