Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In this modern era, technology has transformed at a greater pace. It is suggested by some people that technological advancements are creating a gap between affluent and poor people. Whereas, others consider that there is a decline in the difference between both classes. In my opinion, there are still several areas where the poor have to suffer because of lesser means at their disposal.

On the one hand, the latest invention in the technological field has rendered many changes in the lifestyle of people regardless of which community or class they belong to. For example, smartphones and laptops come in various ranges from exorbitantly expensive to cheaper version, therefore, everyone can easily afford one depending upon their financial status. In addition, the internet is readily available free of cost at various public platforms such as community library, railway station and bus stops, which furnishes easy access to all the information available on the web. As a result, every person now has an equal opportunity to e-learning, social media, and online shopping. Thus, receding the gap between rich and poor.

On the other hand, there are certain technological facilities which have aggravated the difference between wealthy and poorer classes of society. Innovative agricultural practices, for example, are expensive. Only giant companies who have ownership of thousands of hectares of land can turn to such methods of temperature control, agroforestry, and genetically modified crops in order to yield substantial produce. Whereas, a small farmer with fewer means is still dependent on the rudimentary practices of farming through which they struggle to meet ends. Consequently, there is an increasing gap between the privileged and deprived sections of society.

In conclusion, it is true that certain innovations, because of their cheaper cost, are profusely available to rich and poor equally. However, in my opinion, there are still many advanced types of machinery which only the affluent can buy and use it for their advantage, thus, raising the gap between two different sections of society.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a gap between affluent and poor people. Whereas, others consider that there is a declin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in order to yield substantial produce. Whereas, a small farmer with fewer means is sti...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43939393939 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91027280284 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3634757608 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6875 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206851818259 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722282496054 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778154966976 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127907545693 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631043835231 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.