Some people prefer to save money Others prefer to use their money on things they will enjoy What is the best approach

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to save money. Others prefer to use their money on things they will enjoy. What is the best approach?

It is true that you cannot buy happiness with money but you can almost buy all the things with money. Many people save their money for the future, while others love to spend all their money on the things which they love to do. I will highlight the pros and cons of these two approaches in the following paragraphs.
Money has become essential part of our life. It is impossible to survive in this world without money. That’s why; people work hard day and night to meet their ends meet. Many people have different intentions to save their money. For example, my father wanted to buy a house for us, so he was saving money in saving for the period of 10 years and finally bought it last year. Many parents save their excess money for their children. This is because they want to see their child, studying in the top university, which have surmount tuition fees. Sometimes people do not have adequate money to store in saving accounts because they utilize all their income on basic commodities. In such cases, it is impossible to keep money for future benefits.
On the other hand, First and foremost reason that people love to spend all their fortune is that it makes them happy. For instance, big wardrobe full of clothes, different brands of expensive mobile phones, big and beautiful house, and fleet of luxurious cars lined in front of house are all dreams of every person. Secondly, they want to impress others with their expensive attires and luxurious life style. They like to flaunt their money in front of others and always in need of constant attention like celebrities. Though, people waste exorbitant funds on luxurious items which they don’t need. For instance, what is the point of buying 3 cars, when you only need one car? Moreover, you buy coat to protect yourself from cold and mobile phone to communicate with others.
To conclude, there is no point of spending exorbitant funds on high-valued items, when you only need basic commodities. The best approach is to spend money on commodities and allocate rest of the money for the future plans.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'surmounted'.
Suggestion: surmounted
...dying in the top university, which have surmount tuition fees. Sometimes people do not h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of constant attention like celebrities. Though, people waste exorbitant funds on luxur...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obile phone to communicate with others. To conclude, there is no point of spendi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75277777778 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32604516532 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9711251154 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4761904762 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34744982747 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113269304816 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083931185347 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219363681568 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784090778738 0.056905535591 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.