Some people prefer to work for a large company.Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to work for a large company.
Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.

A larger population of the youth seems to be working for software/hardware companies for various factors. This essay will chalk out the benefits and banes of both the sides.

Today, working for a multinational company, for example Wipro or Philips, is advantageous in many ways. Firstly, there is a fixed amount of pay-package that is credited at the end of every month. No person working for an MNC has to be worried about the usual cost cutting that happens at other smaller jobs. Secondly, due to high revenues and profit margins that these companies have, employees are given multiple facilities like air-conditioned cabins, desks, chairs, laptops, insurance benefits, etc. without spending a single penny from their own pocket.

Whilst MNCs provide multiple benefits, working for a start-up has its own perks. There is a great exposure to learning new technologies and skills, since there are lesser clients, which in turn leads to less pressure of the deadlines. Also, working professionals may be allowed to have flexible timings and may not need to work extra hours, which is not possible in large scale companies. The competition is relatively less and hence career growth could be assured in the smaller firms. However, due to less number of clients, the monthly payments may need to be compromised in the initial stages of the startup. Travelling on business purpose is another drawback for people who would love to travel. The startups may not have the budget to accommodate such expenses for their employees. There is also a serious risk of losing jobs if the startups or smaller companies are unable to do well.

In my opinion, both large and small companies are somewhat beneficial if one is ready use those at their best. Although, I would be a bit inclined towards working for a larger company as they would guarantee job security, which has a lesser probability in the latter scenario.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04100946372 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75898123052 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615141955836 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6753915748 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224427520806 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661851428059 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726769362876 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13667885197 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161399872893 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.