Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
There is no deny that education and knowledge are paramount to succeed in this world. Experts such as pedagogic and researchers support the notion that today educational institutions are more focused on course curriculum rather than educating students and professionals on real world skills. On balance, I would argue that their influence is not entirely malign and does have its own sets of perks.
The first point worth making is that factual knowledge and understanding of fundamentals is vital. Subjects such as history, science, biology and mathematics tend to have quite significant practical implementations. So, learning facts for such fields is a critical necessity and hence they are taught from sophomores to graduates level of education. Such as, a doctor does need to have in-depth expertise of diseases and how to cure them without which his education is worthless.
However, I would be skeptical about the aforementioned benefits as their are multifarious qualities which are not part of the academic course structure. Skills such as communication, planning, team-building and goal-settings are lacking in the formal way of education system. For instance: how to deal with a difficult client; meeting a tight deadline on a project which are necessary attributes to succeed in a corporate world. Another point to taken into consideration is that the education establishment spends significant time on grades and bookish knowledge and have far lesser inclination towards either pursuing excellence in particular field or developing cognitive abilities to tackle real life challenges.
In conclusion, it would be ridiculous to argue that the influence of educational institutions has been entirely negative. Yet, to some extend, it is fair to describe it as insidious. I accept that some changes need to amend in the course structure so that they are more in alignment to requirements of outside world where children and students have to compete and become successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...al about the aforementioned benefits as their are multifarious qualities which are no...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...as been entirely negative. Yet, to some extend, it is fair to describe it as insidious...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46925566343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16240019974 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595469255663 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4751277233 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0728920065287 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243053880215 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494391737104 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04332836688 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395367969808 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.