The matter of student’s having education is argued recently years, it is either more practical or more theoretical. Some people claim that students are taught more theoretical rather than educated practıcal-based, regardless of which education level students are in. I totally agree with the statement that the educatıonal system, nowadays, is based on teorıtıcal.
Those who claim the above idea present reasonable perspectives. Firstly, because of the lack of laboratories students are less likely to experience the topic. When the students asked about the theorıtıcal they tend to answer the question easily, in contrast when they face the situation, in reality, they get on difficulties and stuck on somewhere. Since in all level of schools they impose us all facts of a topic rather than giving a chance to experience it, Notoriously, Students cannot figure out when they are faced it.
On the other hand, this is a tangible effect on employment that is easily recognizable. Because many companies are aware that theoretical knowledge is not permanent and useless, It leads them to employe the ones who are graduated from technical universities. Even though technical universities are not as qualified as they must be, they are better than ordinary universities. For example, although I studied at a technical university, we should have had 15 hours of workshop classes, but, we are just though 5 hours per week. Unfortunately, Remaining classes are given in the classroom which is not as effective as workshops, in terms of vividly experience it.
In conclusion, the affection of this issue is significant. Although students have the right to experience practical skills, in reality, they are taught in the classroom which is impossible to show them the experiments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not figure out when they are faced it. On the other hand, this is a tangible ef...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35815602837 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16278860008 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3718051747 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884831004053 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026144506492 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316702837935 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510037713426 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013160074157 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.