Some people say that all secondary and higher school students should be taught how to manage money as it is an
important life skill,
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is the fundamental duty of parents and teachers to provide monetary education to their young ones in order to mould them to responsible citizens. Some people believe that juveniles should be taught about money management during their secondary education, I agree with this suggestion.
There are multiple reasons to support my viewpoint. Firstly, if money management subject is added during the early stages of students' secondary education, they will understand the importance of money during teenage. Owing to this, they will reduce the demand for unnecessary things from their parents such as expensive video games and gadgets. Secondly, by knowing the importance of money, children can help their guardians to manage the funds which further can be invested for their future studies. Thirdly,
money management makes the students more mature, as they will come to know that in order to earn more money, they need to work hard and concentrate on studies rather than focusing on bad habits like smoking and taking drugs.
On the other hand, students are innocent and they might become money-minded if money management is taught at such an early stage. Also, nowadays there is a huge burden of studies on students, adding extra subject will definitely increase the stress on them. Nevertheless, money management subject can be introduced as a non-academic subject to inculcate the knowledge of managing the
funds in students without putting any extra study load.
To conclude, considering the benefits of teaching money management skill during secondary education, I suggest there should be one subject for money management but an assessment for that subject should not be considered in calculating the grades so that there should not be an additional burden on students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ested for their future studies. Thirdly, money management makes the students more...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72395827698 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8125901998 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.727272727 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255413813512 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100857393464 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104148084642 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133187630081 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068459480261 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.