SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES. OTHERS, HOWEVER, SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN

Essay topics:

SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES. OTHERS, HOWEVER, SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED.

DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION.

There is an ongoing debate over the methods for improving public health and lifestyle. While some believe that an increase in the sports facilities is the most effective approach, in my perspective, a nutritive diet is more essential for improving the health of people.

To begin with, those who favour increasing sports facilities assert that a workout through sports improves physical and psychological health. The reason for this is while performing these activities, calories from the body get burnt which leads to excessive weight loss. Also, sports regulate the blood circulation which energies the brain and improves its functionality. For instance, according to a survey done by the 'Medical Institute of Science' on corporate employees, people who are engaged in regular sports are more productive in comparison to others. However, owing to a sedentary lifestyle, people hardly get time to avail of sports facilities, thus this approach can not be considered as the best one.

On the other hand, many people hold a view that sports facilities alone can not ensure the good health of the people, there are many other approaches that should be considered. Of all the ways, the most crucial is the availability of healthy and nutritive diet to the people. The reason for this is the functionalities of the human mind and body are monitored by the quality of food intake and physical workout is not effective unless coupled with a nutritive diet. Therefore, the availability of green vegetables, fruits and food rich in minerals and vitamins is quintessential for the public's health. A mid-day meal in which a free nutritive meal is provided by the government of India to the school students in order to improve their nutritious status serves the best example.

In conclusion, although sports facilities enhance public health to some extent, in my opinion, other measures such as the availability of healthy food are much more effective.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 588, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
... and vitamins is quintessential for the publics health. A mid-day meal in which a free ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20952380952 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86892807496 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530158730159 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9008739993 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263350994902 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092052119808 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565474223065 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170903375307 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188376887627 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.