Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is important to consider how the serious issues of environmental pollution and traffic congestion should be handled. While some believe the hike in fuel rate is the most effective way to mitigate these problems, in my opinion, it is not the best approach as it is a short-term measure. However, there are other more useful ways present such as usage of public transport.
To begin with, increasing the price of petrol is certainly not an efficient approach as it's effectiveness lasts for a smaller period of time. Though it might cut the number of vehicles on the road, its impact on the other daily-use commodities can be adverse, as the price of food and other goods also gets increased with the rise in fuel rate. For instance, according to the survey by 'The Times' in Gurugram in 2019, with the 2% surge in petrol prices, there is always a 10% increase in the rate of vegetables. Therefore, considering the adversity of this approach, it is usually carried out for a limited duration and not a long-term solution.
Nevertheless, there are a plethora of other effective ways to mitigate the menace of traffic and pollution. Of all the approaches the most crucial is the usage of public transportation. With this, people should be motivated to use public buses, metros, and shared-cabs instead of using a personal individual vehicle for commuting. Consequently, this will not only reduce the number of vehicles on roads but also limit the emissions of harmful pollutants. To exemplify, the Alibaba company in Japan provides free commuting service to its employees in a motive to protect the environment from the pollution caused by vehicles.
In conclusion, although some people perceive increasing petrol prices is the best way to curb traffic and pollution, in my perspective, it is an approach with limited effectiveness and according to me using public transport for commutation is one of the other best ways to remedy these problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s its effectiveness lasts for a smaller period of time. Though it might cut the number of vehi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02461538462 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9350362638 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529230769231 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2276594853 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.615384615 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190461365322 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679112715056 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585422077725 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131615365603 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458631023052 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.