Wildlife attracts more attention from the public, and the government allocated a vast amount of fund to protect wild animals and birds. However, some people claim that money should be utilised for human development while others do not. This essay will elaborate on why people should spend moderate money on wildlife conservation.
It is true that human being is superior to animals and therefore it seems reasonable for the public to pay more attention to improve human’s living standard. But it is a one-sided view and ignored the value of wildlife. Protecting wildlife could be a long-term strategic measure to keep eco-system balance which could benefit the public in the long run.
Firstly, wild birds and animals can exert positive impacts on the environment and the public. For example, some wild birds that feed on insects could help to protect the grains from being destroyed by pests. Therefore, the decline in the number of these birds may bring economic loss to farmers. What is worse is that the death of wildlife can cause deterioration of the ecological environment. People in regions are playing a price for this, as illustrated by disastrous consequences such as the extreme weather and sand storms.
Secondly, wildlife also plays a significant role in different cultures. Many wild animals actually represent the cultural backstage of the community. Certain animals are even associated with particular gods and goodness and are often symbolic of a deity’s power. For instance, the cow is revered as the mother in Hindus and therefore, holds a critical value. Which in turn says, protecting wildlife could sometimes equal to the protection of belief.
This essay had discussed the value of the wildlife, and it could build down to three aspects: cost saving, ecological balance, and representation of a particular culture. Thus, I suggest people not to abolish the funding for protecting wild animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80597697136 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583870967742 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6458520405 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234005111806 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660380141451 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734111161959 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126581546255 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105864374972 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.