Some people think that the teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject they are best at or they are interested in. To what extent to you agree?
Juvenile’s education today has become the most popular topic within parents. Some parents follow the traditional system letting adolescent studying all subjects while others embrace the new trend and encourage their children focusing on a specific subject. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and explain why I strongly suggest teenagers learning all disciplines.
It is reasonable for people to believe that concentrate on a particular major is more practical as many subjects may not be useful for their future jobs. This is mainly because most occupations are specialised in a specific field. For example, bankers may find it unnecessary to learn physics which they are seldom dealing with. Adversely, focusing on mathematics - the cornerstone of economics and finance what significantly relates to their job, could give them a durable competitive edge in their career. Nonetheless, people should not ignore the fact that they may not be able to foresee or decide their career at a young age.
One reason that adolescents ought to focus on learning as many different subjects as possible is that they are too immature to make a serious decision that will affect their future. Teenagers usually follow their interests and instincts, which often changes, for making decisions. Studying all subjects therefore, is the best way to help them to get a clearer understanding of their talents and interest to make a rational determination at a later stage. This also turns out why most tertiary institutions only require students to fix a topic at PhD programmes, not degree programmes. Also, acquiring various skills and knowledge provides people with broader visions and more opportunities.
In general, the advantages of teenagers learning all subjects boils down two factors: rational decision and flexible career, and concentrating on a particular subject could only boost efficiency. Personally, I think people should not restrict themselves when they are young.
<br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...olescents ought to focus on learning as many different subjects as possible is that they are t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 692, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...broader visions and more opportunities. In general, the advantages of teenagers ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44838709677 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94193417423 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6586877418 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320808584405 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913969185753 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651409315416 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191912811169 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460012036863 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.