The private vehicle production surges in recent years because of the increasing demand from the public. However, some people assert surplus private car use could negatively impact the environment while others embrace the conveniences that come with buying their own car. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of the private vehicle and why its related impacts on the environment should be considered more.
It is true that people could be benefited by having their own vehicles such as a more flexible lifestyle and more comfortable space. People therefore unnecessary to follow the public transportation’s fixed route and to seat in the congested environment. However, the high cost comes with such benefits could be not ignored. The individuals’ commute cost, a significant part of our living cost, could be considerably different between the private car and the public bus.
On the other hand, some people claim that private car could exert negative impacts to our society and environment. Firstly, carbon produced by vehicles is one of the major air pollutions that impair people’s health. Many research proved the fact that the cities’ air quality is much lower than in the countryside. Secondly, the explosion of private car use brings the big cities’ the heavy traffic which indirectly cost people more time on the road. Thus, some government are compelled to widen the road and occupy vast greenery areas. What more important is that unnecessary energy consumption might be resulting in the crisis of insufficient power and frown the public in the long run.
This essay evaluated private car’s impact from both positive and negative angles. Personally, I suggest people pay more attention to its impairment to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een the private car and the public bus. On the other hand, some people claim tha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: Much research; A good deal of research
...tions that impair people's health. Many research proved the fact that the cities' a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37275985663 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96555076418 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0368012124 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217297582588 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743391063804 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703873929729 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147991163163 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359466118184 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.