There is a controversial debate over opinions insisting the importance of History as a school subject. Some people think that it should be taught the most importantly, on the other hand, other people claim that Science and Technology should be dealt with more significantly than History in school. After discussing these two opposite opinions, I will write about my own opinion.
History is a subject which has been emphasized for a long time for various reasons. First, history enables us to prevent repeating identical mistakes happened in our history. Through history, students can learn about many mistakes and faults our ancestors had. As a result, they can acknowledge which is a smart decision in the similar situation, in that they already learned the outcomes of our ancestors' decisions. Secondly, understanding our own country from multiple respects is possible by learning history. Since many factors which constitute the modern society are results of accumulated history, we can deepen our knowledge about historical causes which led to current culture and society.
Nevertheless, in the 21st century, science and technology are unavoidably significant subjects. In recent days, tremendous new electric devices have been being released, which we have to understand how to use them to survive in modern society. To let students understand utilize these devices efficiently, the education of science and technology should be emphasized. Moreover, since science tells us about basic rules of the nature, it is as important as history is in terms of widening students' views. For example, understanding how the nature works is critical to develop students' thinking toward the world.
In conclusion, History is a meaningful subject, which makes it possible to take a right decision and have deep knowledge about the country, whereas it is obvious science and technology are necessary subjects in modern society. In my opinion, those subjects have the equivalent educational importance, so they should be instructed with the same amount of emphasis.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90234280367 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571875 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7748465807 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249918830607 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793843619337 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737032649272 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164620652691 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130693885335 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.