Some people say that it is the individual’s responsibility to protect the environment while others say that it is the Government’s primary role.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Keeping our environment clean plays an important role in our life. There is no match for health surrounding. While some argue that the government holds the responsibility for cleaning, others says its the moral responsibility of each person living in that area.
On the one hand, the resident holds a key role in tidiness of the surrounding. Doing these kind of activity will lead the people to have certain kind of ownership and they wont be littering. For instance, people who cleaned road knows the pain and they wont cause the road to be dirt themselves. Likewise, individual will get to know their neighbour by means of cleaning activity and take part in discussion. This surges the chance of person getting certain kind of responsibility in their life.
On the other hand, people consider that the government bodies should act as the cleaning authority as they collect taxes from the habitants. By this way, the local body can generate employment and also reduce the burden of the people. For example, the governing authority can setup departments to carry out these activity in a well structured manner, thus providing employment to the job seekers and can carry out mass level campaign like Swatch Bharat. These insights can be accepted to a certain level as it is the moral duty of the government.
In conclusion, both the views have pros and cons. To optimise the cleaning process, my view is to enable the public government partnership. By that way, the resident can inspect and report the cleaning process carried out by the local body. This makes both resident and government to be vigil. After all, one hand cant make a clap.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...esponsibility for cleaning, others says its the moral responsibility of each person...
^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...e in tidiness of the surrounding. Doing these kind of activity will lead the people to hav...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can set up'?
Suggestion: can set up
...e. For example, the governing authority can setup departments to carry out these activity...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this activity' or 'these activities'?
Suggestion: this activity; these activities
...rity can setup departments to carry out these activity in a well structured manner, thus provi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rnment to be vigil. After all, one hand cant make a clap.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, thus, well, while, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91756272401 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68013613705 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7624129697 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7058823529 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154097624677 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469724178283 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565128763022 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978732225976 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616285386375 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.