some people watch sports on tv than playing sports. it is a positive development or negative development?
In the tech-savvy era, without any qualms, it is accepted that, watching sports on television rather than participating cause detrimental effects on human health and body. Whilst, others coincide that it has some positive sides. Thereby, I opine that it leads to adverse trends, and in this essay, I shall explain both sides of the argument by analysing it.
On the one hand, compelling pieces of evidence prove that seeing sports events on television than partaking has some serious repercussions on a person. Firstly, watching sports for a long time on television cause problems such as obesity and eye-sight problems. Secondly, the hindmost inextricable feature is people become less fit and shape. For example, according to the recent survey conducted by the World Health Organisation, around 60% of people have obesity, due to lack of exercise. Consequently, it brings poor health conditions in humans lives.
On the flip side, people across the board discriminate that sports watched through television box are not a negative development. First, it is safe to watch some rigorous games than playing because there is a possibility of getting injured. For example, the cricket ball is the hardest material so if hits the player then definitely it hurts which even could end up in serious wounds. Moreover, it is not possible to be playing out during hot summer or rainy season, so watching television sports is a feasible solution under these circumstances. However, there is concern about an inert and dull lifestyle which is dangerous by both physical and psychological way.
In conclusion, innumerable robust factors are underpinning the facts that watching sports would deliberately affect human health and mind. Therefore, it leads to a negative development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34519572954 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90832039651 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640569395018 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8147531468 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243947405238 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740624855246 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591272274327 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135442535971 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310832061357 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.