Education is the fundamental principle of everyone's life. However, in this essay, there are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that parents should give support to their children in participating in organized group activities in their leisure time while others emphasize that younglings should self-learn to occupy their minds on their own.
On the one hand, various factors make a section of people advocate that parents can encourage their children to get involved in extra-curricular activities and have many reasons to substantiate it. First and Foremost is involving in such activities makes juveniles develop leadership skills and qualities. Since many children spend their free time watching television programs for entertainment, parents should integrate their children to be part of extracurricular activities such as sports, music, and others. This motivation will enhance youngling's performance to become a great team player in the future.
On the other hand, some parents believe that an adolescent should figure out on their own to occupy themselves instead of mentoring by parents for myriad reasons. Chiefly, nowadays, it is easy to learn skills online which can prove fruitful to younglings in the real world. To illustrate, online platforms like Youtube, Udemy, and several others have provided professional experts to improve our abilities. One can learn a new language, coding, and many other countless skills which counts beneficial to a person in the future.
In my profound opinion, both views are imperative in children's life where extroverted juveniles can take part in team activities and introverted can learn through multiple online streams platforms. In any way, children will develop skills and new qualities to compete in the real world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...learn to occupy their minds on their own On the one hand various factors make a s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s to substantiate it First and Foremost is involving in such activities makes juveniles deve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts beneficial to a person in the future In my profound opinion both views are im...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48014440433 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8875315351 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 277.0 20.2975951904 1365% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1518.0 106.682146367 1423% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 277.0 20.7667163134 1334% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 57.0 7.06120827912 807% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405656430573 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.405656430573 0.084324248473 481% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236560515576 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087080598375 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 142.9 13.0946893788 1091% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -218.14 50.2224549098 -434% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 112.5 11.3001002004 996% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.98 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.54 8.58950901804 251% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 112.8 10.1190380762 1115% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 113.0 10.7795591182 1048% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.