Some people say a person’s success in adult life is the result of the way they brought up as a child by their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that success in mature life is the outcome of fostering a child by their parents. I completely disagree with this statement. To become successful in life, talent and hard work are important, not the facilities offered by parents at a young age.
First of all, achievement is impossible without deep understanding of the task and talent helps in this regard. Mark Zuckerburg is a good example of this. Before him, many people had given the idea about social media platform, but Mark has launched it, Facebook, successfully. Though his parents wanted to get him involved in their family business, Mark was not interested at all. In addition, Argentina’s football legend Maradona was from a poor family background, but later became a successful soccer player. For these reasons, if the target is understood properly, then it is not impossible to achieve that and childhood fostering or parents’ role is very limited in this case.
Secondly, without hard work, it is difficult to have success. For example, in childhood, Bill Gates had not received much help from his parents but he worked very hard to build Microsoft, after couple of years, he has become a successful entrepreneur. In addition, John Milton became a remarkable poet in English literature, though he was an orphan. So, to triumph something in life, hard effort is necessary.
Finally, parents try give a guidance to their children to become successful in mature life, but, in reality, it varies from person to person, whether they will achieve the feat of not.
In conclusion, ability and great effort are the result of a person’s success. In my opinion, parents try to bring up their young charges in way, so that they can have success in their life. But early age facilities have a little effect regarding achievements of a winner. Hunger for success always leads a man to his victory.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02229299363 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85566519836 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589171974522 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3414431457 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6111111111 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208116705328 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651347010548 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720850610275 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13085623659 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717824331039 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.