Some people say a person’s success in adult life is the result of the way they brought up as a child by their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that success in mature life is the outcome of fostering a child by their parents. I completely disagree with this statement. To become successful in life, talent and hard work are important, not the facilities offered by parents at a young age.
First of all, achievement is impossible without deep understanding of the task and talent helps in this regard. Mark Zuckerburg is a good example of this. Before him, many people had given the idea about social media platform, but Mark has launched it, Facebook, successfully. Though his parents wanted to get him involved in their family business, Mark was not interested at all. In addition, Argentina’s football legend Maradona was from a poor family background, but later became a successful soccer player. For these reasons, if the target is understood properly, then it is not impossible to achieve that and childhood fostering or parents’ role is very limited in this case.
Secondly, without hard work, it is difficult to have success. For example, in childhood, Bill Gates had not received much help from his parents but he worked very hard to build Microsoft, after couple of years, he has become a successful entrepreneur.
Finally, parents try give a guidance to their children to become successful in mature life, but, in reality, it varies from person to person, whether they will achieve the feat of not.
In conclusion, ability and great effort are the result of a person’s success. In my opinion, parents try to bring up their young charges in way, so that they can have success in their life. But early age facilities have a little effect regarding achievements of a winner. Hunger for success always leads a man to his victory.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01736111111 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84825311622 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5908690831 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213914178546 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706017318511 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742937107826 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129751817998 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731862963222 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.