Some people say that schools should spend more money on the best equipment, others say that more experienced teachers should be hired. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The challenge of funds distribution at schools has become a burning issue nowadays. While some people believe that school should focus on modern equipment, others, as well as me, are consider hiring highly-qualified teachers more important. There are valid arguments from both sides, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, some people believe that highly-experienced teachers tend to be an integral part of successful education and cannot be replaced by expensive equipment. First of all, they seem to have a specific skill for teaching their students, which can make the educational process more enjoyable and exciting. In other words, they tend to explain all the material comprehensively and influence on academic performance positively. Also, an excellent teacher may encourage and support students, in case of any difficulties. Finally, the motivation question may be solved by a professional teacher as well.
On the other hand, nowadays students should learn up-to-date technology, which seems to be complicated without excellent school equipment. For instance, personal computers have become a common attribute of a human's life so modern schools cannot be imagined without using computers or laptops. Another argument is that innovative equipment in schools may make the educational process more efficient and available. For instance, access to school sources through the Internet tends to extend the opportunities of ordinary students and to release receiving education by disabled people.
All in all, despite the view, that equipment in schools should be the main part of expenses, I tend to believe that the crucial role of professional teachers in the education process cannot be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...n equipment, others, as well as me, are consider hiring highly-qualified teachers more i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ers have become a common attribute of a humans life so modern schools cannot be imagin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57954545455 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11263163027 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5138106329 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260598576763 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882312745212 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652957852188 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167025690111 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411527353756 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.