Some people support the development of factory farming and the science creation of fruits and vegetables in agriculture, but others oppose to these developments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, technology has dominated almost all aspects of human’s lives and it is apparent in food industry as well. While a group of people argue with regard to the adverse effects of developments in factory farming industry and the prevalence of foods that are produced by human on people’s health, others see it as a great achievement. I believe that the drawbacks by far outweigh the benefits.
There are a variety of reasons why I would argue that there are more disadvantages for this scheme. Firstly, It is cruel and unethical to keep animals in factory farm condition with the aim of eating them since they have the right to live. Secondly, it has not been yet proven that the fruits and vegetables that are developed by science are safe and healthy. They may have detrimental effects on people which would be revealed in the future. Finally, there are some persuasive arguments against expansion of GM crops which indicate that the GM products can contaminate the nearby products and consequently there would be some faults in the agricultural products.
On the other hand, there are some strong arguments in favour of these developments and people assert that it was a big achievement for scientists. It is a fact that animals are in human’s food chain and if animals do not keep in factory farm conditions with aim of being slaughtered by people, there would be no warranty that they would not be dead due to diseases. Furthermore, in many developing countries people die as a result of famine and scarcity in food products, consequently the science creation of fruits and vegetables can be beneficial.
In conclusion, although the recent developments in food industry affected the human’s lives in a variety of ways, I believe the government authorities should control and regulate the product process and they should be banned until scientists can ensure that they are safe and beneficial for the body and there is no threat for individual’s health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96543293132 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506060606061 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1436808736 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170574786665 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690718618195 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674902659164 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104831392449 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608616636791 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.