Some people think that all university students study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in future, such as those related to science and technology .
Discuss both these views and give your own.
People have different views about study courses, whether university adults go for courses of personal interest or they should opt for science and technology field. While personal preference is good, I believe traditional subjects like science, Information technology are more beneficial for trainees.
On the one hand, going for own interest is better because a learner can learn better, as one’s interest in subjects can help to concentrate better, which results in good results. Also, if students will go for other courses than technology then balance is maintained between society, as society can not handle all engineers and scientists. There should be also some artist, who can fill colour in lives. Furthermore, a healthy future will be developed when school folks will not be under pressure of superiors and they can create better decisions for career.
On the other side, choosing technical subjects are also helpful for future. I believe that college trainees can go for technical subjects and not personal choice courses. As technology is changing at very high pace. So, more experts are needed who can handle upgrading technology. Thus, students who are already expert in science field will get advantage to get jobs. Moreover, fixed subjects in colleges are helpful to study only given syllabus and thus can concentrate better on specific areas.
In conclusion, I believe why might people think want to have courses of personal choice but it seems to me that there is good career if trainees will go for scientific and technical subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...t is better because a learner can learn better, as one's interest in subjects can...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bjects and not personal choice courses. As technology is changing at very high pac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.272 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64406051368 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.912765899 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.384615385 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227059659114 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824137755222 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512139244204 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136329334496 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450459013165 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.