Some people think that the best way to solve the environment issue is to increase the cost of fuels for car and other vehicles. What extend do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are becoming detrimental with the drastic increase in pollution these days. Raising petroleum prices can be a possible solution for this issue according to a certain school of thought. I partially agree with the assertion as many people who own the cars have the capacity to buy expensive fuel as well and it would not bring enough change in personal vehicle usage.
First and foremost, it will affect the people who are struggling with their jobs. They can consider stopping the usage of personal transport to cut down their expenses. As a result, a small number of vehicles can be removed from the roads and it could help to reduce congestions, air and noise pollution. In many middle-eastern countries like UAE, KSA, Oman, and Qatar, for instance, people prefer to have a personal vehicle when they have job. Otherwise, they can have survival issues due to other high living expenses. However, it would be effective until they are jobless for a short period of time and it would not make much difference to sort out the environmental issues.
Conversely, most people are enough wound to afford expensive petrol. They are making excessive earnings to have a luxurious lifestyle and they are less likely to compromise on their integral part of traveling. That is why it seems that this initiative would be insufficient to ameliorate the environment as a large number of car users would not change their lifestyle simply for an increase in fuel prices. Rather illustrative examples are European countries like UK, France, and Italy where petrol prices are the highest in the world. Still, most people have their personal cars and there is no change regardless of high fuel prices.
The conclusion to be drawn is that high-cost fuel can stop jobless people to use their own cars but it would last only until they find a new job. Moreover, people who are already using cars are less likely to give up as they are making enough money to afford a good lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...o cut down their expenses. As a result, a small number of vehicles can be removed from the roads ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
... have a personal vehicle when they have job. Otherwise, they can have survival issu...
^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tive until they are jobless for a short period of time and it would not make much difference t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...icient to ameliorate the environment as a large number of car users would not change their lifest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... simply for an increase in fuel prices. Rather illustrative examples are European coun...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91394658754 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60990657377 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53412462908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0983357476 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167433858052 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559421820367 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416216773534 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112682494938 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222971398809 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.